- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Challenger MT275 vs. McCormick CT47
Challenger MT275 vs. McCormick CT47
1 reasons to buy Challenger MT275:
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 46.2 l/min and 31 l/min | 33 % more or 15.2 l/min |
7 reasons to buy McCormick CT47:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 38 l. and 29.9 l. | 21 % more or 8.1 l. |
Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 1250 kg and 952.5 kg | 24 % more or 297.5 kg |
Motor
Displacement | 2.5 l. and 1.5 l. | 40 % more or 1.0 l. |
Full power | 35 kW and 29.9 kW | 15 % more or 5.1 kW |
Cylinders number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 16 and 8 | 50 % more or 8 |
Reverse gears number | 16 and 8 | 50 % more or 8 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Dimensional length | 3009.9 mm and 3192 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2368.3 mm and 2415 mm |
Wheelbase | 1740.4 mm and 1758 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 1331.3 kg and 1625 kg |
Three-point attachment type | Cat. I and 1 |
Motor
Power take mechanism power | 24.2 kW and 30.6 kW |
Power measured at | 2600 rev / min and 2600 rev / min |
Gear box
Transmission type | Synchronized mechanical drive and Synchronized |
Images
Sizes
4. Wheelbase | 1740.4 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1758 mm |
1. Dimensional length | 3009.9 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3192 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2368.3 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2415 mm |


