- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Challenger MT295 vs. Fendt 936
Challenger MT295 vs. Fendt 936
1 reasons to buy Challenger MT295:
Motor
| Power measured at | 2500 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 12 % more or 300 rev |
5 reasons to buy Fendt 936:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 660 l. and 48.1 l. | 93 % more or 611.9 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 265 kW and 33 kW | 88 % more or 232 kW |
| Displacement | 7.1 l. and 2.2 l. | 69 % more or 4.9 l. |
| Cylinders number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 160 l/min and 47.7 l/min | 70 % more or 112.3 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 2435.4 mm and 3322 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1929.4 mm and 3050 mm |
| Dimensional length | 3578.4 mm and 5655 mm |
| Outer frame width | 1816.6 mm and 2750 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 1752.7 kg and 10360 kg |
Motor
| Aspiration | natural aspiration and Turbocharging with intercooler |
Hydraulic system
| Overflow valve pressure | 15685.6 kPa and 20000 kPa |
Gear box
| Transmission type | synchronized gearbox with power gear shifting and Infinitely variable transmission |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 3578.4 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5655 mm |
| 2. Outer frame width | 1816.6 mm | 2. Outer frame width | 2750 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2435.4 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3322 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 1929.4 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3050 mm |