vs.

      Challenger MT315B vs. McCormick C95 Max

      1 reasons to buy Challenger MT315B:

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 109.7 l. and 102 l. 7 % more or 7.7 l.

      7 reasons to buy McCormick C95 Max:

      Motor

      Full power 68.5 kW and 43.3 kW 37 % more or 25.2 kW
      Power measured at 2200 rev / min and 2150 rev / min 2 % more or 50 rev
      Displacement 4.4 l. and 3.3 l. 25 % more or 1.1 l.
      Cylinders number 4 and 3 25 % more or 1

      Hydraulic system

      Pump bandwidth 82.2 l/min and 59.8 l/min 27 % more or 22.4 l/min

      Gear box

      Maximum speed 40 km/h and 29.9 km/h 25 % more or 10.1 km/h
      Forward gears number 24 and 12 50 % more or 12

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Tyre size 16.9-30(Rear) and Front 13.6-24 Rear 16.9-34
      Outer frame width 1930 mm and 1732 mm
      Dimensional length 1480 mm and 4136 mm
      Height to cab upper part 1050 mm and 2558 mm
      Wheelbase 827 mm and 2316 mm

      Operation

      Working weight 3000.1 kg and 3330 kg
      Three-point attachment type Cat. I/II and Cat. 2

      Motor

      Aspiration turbocharging and turbocharging

      Hydraulic system

      Overflow valve pressure 18995 kPa and 18000 kPa
      Remote control valves number 2 and 2

      Gear box

      Reverse gears number 12 and 12
      Transmission type synchronizer and mechanical reversing clutch

      Images

      Sizes

      1. Dimensional length 1480 mm 1. Dimensional length 4136 mm
      2. Outer frame width 1930 mm 2. Outer frame width 1732 mm
      3. Height to cab upper part 1050 mm 3. Height to cab upper part 2558 mm
      4. Wheelbase 827 mm 4. Wheelbase 2316 mm