- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Challenger MT325B vs. AGCO LT95A
Challenger MT325B vs. AGCO LT95A
6 reasons to buy AGCO LT95A:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 145 l. and 109.7 l. | 24 % more or 35.3 l. |
Motor
| Displacement | 4.4 l. and 3.3 l. | 25 % more or 1.1 l. |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2150 rev / min | 2 % more or 50 rev |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 100 l/min and 59.8 l/min | 40 % more or 40.2 l/min |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 16 and 12 | 25 % more or 4 |
| Reverse gears number | 16 and 12 | 25 % more or 4 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 827 mm and 2670 mm |
| Dimensional length | 1480 mm and 4368 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 1050 mm and 2802 mm |
Operation
| Three-point attachment type | Cat. I/II and Category II |
| Working weight | 3000.1 kg and 4349 kg |
Motor
| Aspiration | turbocharging and Turbocharging with intercooler |
| Power take mechanism power | 41 kW and 70.8 kW |
Hydraulic system
| Remote control valves number | 2 and 2 |
Gear box
| Transmission type | synchronizer and powershift |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 1480 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4368 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 1050 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2802 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 827 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2670 mm |