- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Challenger MT335B vs. McCormick CT41HST
Challenger MT335B vs. McCormick CT41HST
6 reasons to buy Challenger MT335B:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 109.8 l. and 38 l. | 65 % more or 71.8 l. |
| Generator current strength | 80 amperes and 50 amperes | 37 % more or 30 amperes |
Motor
| Full power | 58.2 kW and 30.6 kW | 47 % more or 27.6 kW |
| Displacement | 3.3 l. and 2.3 l. | 30 % more or 1.0 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 59.8 l/min and 31 l/min | 48 % more or 28.8 l/min |
Gear box
| Maximum speed | 29.9 km/h and 24.4 km/h | 18 % more or 5.5 km/h |
2 reasons to buy McCormick CT41HST:
Motor
| Power measured at | 2600 rev / min and 2150 rev / min | 17 % more or 450 rev |
| Cylinders number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 1480 mm and 3192 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 1050 mm and 2415 mm |
| Wheelbase | 827 mm and 1758 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 3000.1 kg and 1625 kg |
| Three-point attachment type | Cat. I/II and 1 |
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Motor
| Power take mechanism power | 48.5 kW and 25.4 kW |
Hydraulic system
| Remote control valves number | 2 and 2 |
Gear box
| Transmission type | synchronizer and HST 3 ranges |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 1480 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3192 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 1050 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2415 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 827 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1758 mm |