- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Challenger MT335B vs. New Holland TN75FA
Challenger MT335B vs. New Holland TN75FA
3 reasons to buy Challenger MT335B:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 109.8 l. and 16 l. | 85 % more or 93.8 l. |
Motor
Full power | 58.2 kW and 53.7 kW | 8 % more or 4.5 kW |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 59.8 l/min and 46.9 l/min | 22 % more or 12.9 l/min |
6 reasons to buy New Holland TN75FA:
Operation
Generator current strength | 85 amperes and 80 amperes | 6 % more or 5 amperes |
Motor
Power measured at | 2300 rev / min and 2150 rev / min | 7 % more or 150 rev |
Cylinders number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
Displacement | 3.9 l. and 3.3 l. | 15 % more or 0.6 l. |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 16 and 12 | 25 % more or 4 |
Reverse gears number | 16 and 12 | 25 % more or 4 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Tyre size | 16.9-30(Rear) and Rear 380/70R24 |
Outer frame width | 1930 mm and 1506 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 1050 mm and 2356 mm |
Wheelbase | 827 mm and 2431 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 3000.1 kg and 2817 kg |
Three-point attachment type | Cat. I/II and Cat. II |
Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Motor
Aspiration | turbocharging and natural aspiration |
Power take mechanism power | 48.5 kW and 44.7 kW |
Hydraulic system
Overflow valve pressure | 18995 kPa and 18995 kPa |
Gear box
Transmission type | synchronizer and Synchro Command |
Images
Sizes
2. Outer frame width | 1930 mm | 2. Outer frame width | 1506 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 1050 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2356 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 827 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2431 mm |