- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Challenger MT755B vs. Challenger MT275B
Challenger MT755B vs. Challenger MT275B
9 reasons to buy Challenger MT755B:
Sizes
| Clearance | 365 mm and 356 mm | 2 % more or 9 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 446.7 l. and 40.1 l. | 91 % more or 406.6 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 7257.5 kg and 1149.9 kg | 84 % more or 6107.6 kg |
Motor
| Displacement | 8.8 l. and 1.5 l. | 83 % more or 7.3 l. |
| Cylinders number | 6 and 3 | 50 % more or 3 |
| Full power | 224.5 kW and 29.9 kW | 87 % more or 194.6 kW |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 164.7 l/min and 48.1 l/min | 71 % more or 116.6 l/min |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 16 and 8 | 50 % more or 8 |
| Maximum speed | 39.6 km/h and 26.7 km/h | 33 % more or 12.9 km/h |
2 reasons to buy Challenger MT275B:
Motor
| Power measured at | 2600 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 19 % more or 500 rev |
Gear box
| Reverse gears number | 8 and 4 | 50 % more or 4 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 2438 mm and 1770 mm |
| Outer frame width | 3376 mm and 1580 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5917 mm and 3070 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3444 mm and 2220 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 14095.4 kg and 1437.4 kg |
| Three-point attachment type | Standard cat.3 / 3H and Cat.I |
Motor
| Aspiration | Turbocharged engine with subsequent cooling of charging air by oncoming air flow and turbocharging |
| Power take mechanism power | 182.7 kW and 22 kW |
Hydraulic system
| Overflow valve pressure | 19994.8 kPa and 15692.5 kPa |
Gear box
| Transmission type | powershift transmission and synchronizer |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Outer frame width | 3376 mm | 2. Outer frame width | 1580 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3444 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2220 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2438 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1770 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 365 mm | 5. Clearance | 356 mm |
| 1. Dimensional length | 5917 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3070 mm |