- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Challenger MT765B vs. John Deere 5403
Challenger MT765B vs. John Deere 5403
5 reasons to buy Challenger MT765B:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 446.7 l. and 72 l. | 84 % more or 374.7 l. |
Motor
| Displacement | 8.8 l. and 2.9 l. | 67 % more or 5.9 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Remote control valves number | 4 and 1 | 75 % more or 3 |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 16 and 9 | 44 % more or 7 |
| Reverse gears number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 2438 mm and 2050 mm |
Motor
| Aspiration | Turbocharged engine with subsequent cooling of charging air by oncoming air flow and turbocharging |
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and John Deere |
Gear box
| Transmission type | powershift transmission and transmission with synchronizer |
Images
Sizes
| 4. Wheelbase | 2438 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2050 mm |