- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Challenger MT865B vs. McCormick CN50
Challenger MT865B vs. McCormick CN50
8 reasons to buy Challenger MT865B:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 1254 l. and 51 l. | 96 % more or 1203 l. |
Generator current strength | 185 amperes and 45 amperes | 76 % more or 140 amperes |
Motor
Displacement | 18.1 l. and 2.5 l. | 86 % more or 15.6 l. |
Cylinders number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
Full power | 380.3 kW and 35 kW | 91 % more or 345.3 kW |
Hydraulic system
Remote control valves number | 4 and 2 | 50 % more or 2 |
Pump bandwidth | 164.7 l/min and 34.4 l/min | 79 % more or 130.3 l/min |
Gear box
Maximum speed | 39.6 km/h and 27.7 km/h | 30 % more or 11.9 km/h |
2 reasons to buy McCormick CN50:
Motor
Power measured at | 2600 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 19 % more or 500 rev |
Gear box
Reverse gears number | 16 and 4 | 75 % more or 12 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Dimensional length | 6863 mm and 3193 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3509 mm and 2408 mm |
Wheelbase | 2997 mm and 1900 mm |
Outer frame width | 3601 mm and 1303 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Working weight | 19141.6 kg and 2360 kg |
Three-point attachment type | extra and 1 |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Mitsubishi |
Power take mechanism power | 316.9 kW and 32.8 kW |
Gear box
Transmission type | powershift transmission and transmission with synchronizer |
Forward gears number | 16 and 16 |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 6863 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3193 mm |
2. Outer frame width | 3601 mm | 2. Outer frame width | 1303 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3509 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2408 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 2997 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1900 mm |