- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Challenger MT875B vs. John Deere 9520T
Challenger MT875B vs. John Deere 9520T
5 reasons to buy Challenger MT875B:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1254 l. and 1135.6 l. | 9 % more or 118.4 l. |
Motor
| Displacement | 18.1 l. and 12.6 l. | 30 % more or 5.5 l. |
| Full power | 425 kW and 335.6 kW | 21 % more or 89.4 kW |
| Torque increase | 42 % and 37 % | 12 % more or 5 % |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 164.7 l/min and 113.6 l/min | 31 % more or 51.1 l/min |
2 reasons to buy John Deere 9520T:
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 18 and 16 | 11 % more or 2 |
| Reverse gears number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 2997 mm and 2820 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 19141.6 kg and 17690 kg |
Motor
| Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and John Deere |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged engine with subsequent cooling of charging air by oncoming air flow and Turbocharged engine with subsequent cooling of charging air by oncoming air flow |
| Power take mechanism power | 316.9 kW and 248.3 kW |
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 2100 rev / min |
Hydraulic system
| Overflow valve pressure | 19994.8 kPa and 19994.8 kPa |
| Remote control valves number | 4 and 4 |
Gear box
| Transmission type | powershift transmission and powershift transmission |
Images
Sizes
| 4. Wheelbase | 2997 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2820 mm |