- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Challenger MT875B vs. Steyr 6175 CVT
Challenger MT875B vs. Steyr 6175 CVT
4 reasons to buy Challenger MT875B:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1254 l. and 310 l. | 75 % more or 944 l. |
Motor
| Torque increase | 42 % and 39 % | 7 % more or 3 % |
| Displacement | 18.1 l. and 6.6 l. | 64 % more or 11.5 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 164.7 l/min and 130 l/min | 21 % more or 34.7 l/min |
2 reasons to buy Steyr 6175 CVT:
Hydraulic system
| Remote control valves number | 8 and 4 | 50 % more or 4 |
Gear box
| Maximum speed | 40 km/h and 39.6 km/h | 1 % more or 0.4 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Outer frame width | 3601 mm and 2550 mm |
| Dimensional length | 6863 mm and 4786 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3509 mm and 3042 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2997 mm and 2832 mm |
Motor
| Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged engine with subsequent cooling of charging air by oncoming air flow and Turbocharging with intercooler |
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 2100 rev / min |
Hydraulic system
| Overflow valve pressure | 19994.8 kPa and 20500 kPa |
Gear box
| Transmission type | powershift transmission and continuous alternating |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 6863 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4786 mm |
| 2. Outer frame width | 3601 mm | 2. Outer frame width | 2550 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3509 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3042 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2997 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2832 mm |