- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Fendt 206 S vs. McCormick CX95
Fendt 206 S vs. McCormick CX95
1 reasons to buy Fendt 206 S:
Motor
| Power measured at | 2300 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 4 % more or 100 rev |
8 reasons to buy McCormick CX95:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 155 l. and 72 l. | 54 % more or 83 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 67.1 kW and 48 kW | 28 % more or 19.1 kW |
| Cylinders number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
| Displacement | 4.4 l. and 3.2 l. | 27 % more or 1.2 l. |
| Torque increase | 33 % and 31 % | 6 % more or 2 % |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 60 l/min and 47 l/min | 22 % more or 13 l/min |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 24 and 21 | 12 % more or 3 |
| Reverse gears number | 24 and 6 | 75 % more or 18 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 3565 mm and 4209 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2475 mm and 2540 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2102 mm and 2356 mm |
| Outer frame width | 1925 mm and 2147 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 2930 kg and 3770 kg |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Gearbox with overdrive, with synchronizer, with close in magnitude gear ratios and Powershift / power drive |
| Maximum speed | 40 km/h and 40 km/h |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 3565 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4209 mm |
| 2. Outer frame width | 1925 mm | 2. Outer frame width | 2147 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2475 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2540 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2102 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2356 mm |