- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Fendt 818 vs. McCormick MC115
Fendt 818 vs. McCormick MC115
7 reasons to buy Fendt 818:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 340 l. and 196 l. | 42 % more or 144 l. |
| Generator current strength | 150 amperes and 95 amperes | 37 % more or 55 amperes |
Motor
| Displacement | 5.7 l. and 4.4 l. | 23 % more or 1.3 l. |
| Torque increase | 37 % and 30 % | 19 % more or 7 % |
| Cylinders number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
| Full power | 143 kW and 88 kW | 38 % more or 55 kW |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 110 l/min and 109 l/min | 1 % more or 1 l/min |
2 reasons to buy McCormick MC115:
Operation
| Turn radius | 4450 mm and 5600 mm | 21 % less or 1150 mm |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 2720 mm and 2517 mm |
| Tyre size | Front 540/65R30, Rear 650/65R42 and Front 13.6R28 Rear 16.9R38 |
| Dimensional length | 4700 mm and 4423 mm |
| Outer frame width | 2550 mm and 2300 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3020 mm and 2790 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 6800 kg and 5495 kg |
Motor
| Aspiration | Turbocharging with intercooler and Intermediate cooler exhaust turbocharger with wastegate |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Outer frame width | 2550 mm | 2. Outer frame width | 2300 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3020 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2790 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2720 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2517 mm |
| 1. Dimensional length | 4700 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4423 mm |