- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Landini Mistral 40 vs. McCormick CX75-L
Landini Mistral 40 vs. McCormick CX75-L
7 reasons to buy McCormick CX75-L:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 90 l. and 40.1 l. | 55 % more or 49.9 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 56.7 kW and 26.5 kW | 53 % more or 30.2 kW |
| Cylinders number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
| Displacement | 3.3 l. and 1.6 l. | 52 % more or 1.7 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 57 l/min and 47.3 l/min | 17 % more or 9.7 l/min |
Gear box
| Reverse gears number | 30 and 12 | 60 % more or 18 |
| Forward gears number | 30 and 12 | 60 % more or 18 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 3300 mm and 4020 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2110 mm and 2485 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1700 mm and 2162 mm |
| Tyre size | 320/70R20 and 12.4R36 |
| Outer frame width | 1260 mm and 1876 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 1447 kg and 3050 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Yanmar and Perkins |
| Model | 3TNV88-KLAN and 804C-33T |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Main and mechanical reversing clutch |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 3300 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4020 mm |
| 2. Outer frame width | 1260 mm | 2. Outer frame width | 1876 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2110 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2485 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 1700 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2162 mm |