- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Massey Ferguson MF 240 vs. McCormick CT36HST
Massey Ferguson MF 240 vs. McCormick CT36HST
4 reasons to buy Massey Ferguson MF 240:
Sizes
| Clearance | 338 mm and 330 mm | 2 % more or 8 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 47.5 l. and 32 l. | 33 % more or 15.5 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 37.3 kW and 28.7 kW | 23 % more or 8.6 kW |
Gear box
| Maximum speed | 28.6 km/h and 26.6 km/h | 7 % more or 2.0 km/h |
3 reasons to buy McCormick CT36HST:
Motor
| Power measured at | 2700 rev / min and 2250 rev / min | 17 % more or 450 rev |
| Cylinders number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 30.8 l/min and 16 l/min | 48 % more or 14.8 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 3260 mm and 2987 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1892 mm and 1660 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 1690 kg and 1230 kg |
Motor
| Power take mechanism power | 32.8 kW and 21.6 kW |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Sliding spur gear and HST 3 ranges |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 3260 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 2987 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 1892 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1660 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 338 mm | 5. Clearance | 330 mm |