- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Massey Ferguson MF 3425 CFM vs. Challenger MT285B
Massey Ferguson MF 3425 CFM vs. Challenger MT285B
5 reasons to buy Massey Ferguson MF 3425 CFM:
Operation
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 2650 kg and 1399.8 kg | 47 % more or 1250.2 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 95 l. and 50 l. | 47 % more or 45 l. |
Motor
| Displacement | 4.4 l. and 2.2 l. | 50 % more or 2.2 l. |
| Full power | 50.7 kW and 35.4 kW | 30 % more or 15.3 kW |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 16 and 8 | 50 % more or 8 |
2 reasons to buy Challenger MT285B:
Motor
| Power measured at | 2600 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 15 % more or 400 rev |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 56.4 l/min and 39 l/min | 31 % more or 17.4 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Outer frame width | 1700 mm and 1660 mm |
| Dimensional length | 3500 mm and 3370 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2315 mm and 2290 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1650 mm and 1900 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 4190 kg and 1660.1 kg |
Motor
| Aspiration | natural aspiration and natural aspiration |
Hydraulic system
| Overflow valve pressure | 18000 kPa and 15692.5 kPa |
Gear box
| Transmission type | reverse clutch and overdrive and synchronizer |
| Reverse gears number | 8 and 8 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 3500 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3370 mm |
| 2. Outer frame width | 1700 mm | 2. Outer frame width | 1660 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2315 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2290 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 1650 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1900 mm |