- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Massey Ferguson MF 5425 vs. McCormick CT36
Massey Ferguson MF 5425 vs. McCormick CT36
7 reasons to buy Massey Ferguson MF 5425:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 130 l. and 32 l. | 75 % more or 98 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 5000 kg and 1188 kg | 76 % more or 3812 kg |
Motor
| Full power | 55.9 kW and 28.7 kW | 49 % more or 27.2 kW |
| Displacement | 4.4 l. and 1.8 l. | 59 % more or 2.6 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 57 l/min and 30.8 l/min | 46 % more or 26.2 l/min |
Gear box
| Reverse gears number | 16 and 12 | 25 % more or 4 |
| Forward gears number | 16 and 12 | 25 % more or 4 |
2 reasons to buy McCormick CT36:
Operation
| Turn radius | 2558 mm and 4200 mm | 39 % less or 1642 mm |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2700 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 19 % more or 500 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 2460 mm and 1660 mm |
| Dimensional length | 4210 mm and 2987 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2750 mm and 2314 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 3865 kg and 1230 kg |
Hydraulic system
| Remote control valves number | 2 and 2 |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Gearbox with speeds switching and Synchronized |
Images
Sizes
| 4. Wheelbase | 2460 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1660 mm |
| 1. Dimensional length | 4210 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 2987 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2750 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2314 mm |