- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick C105 Max vs. Buhler Versatile 305
McCormick C105 Max vs. Buhler Versatile 305
5 reasons to buy McCormick C105 Max:
Operation
| Turn radius | 4100 mm and 4860 mm | 16 % less or 760 mm |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 18 % more or 400 rev |
Gear box
| Maximum speed | 40 km/h and 35 km/h | 12 % more or 5 km/h |
| Forward gears number | 24 and 12 | 50 % more or 12 |
| Reverse gears number | 12 and 4 | 67 % more or 8 |
6 reasons to buy Buhler Versatile 305:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 946.4 l. and 102 l. | 89 % more or 844.4 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 5896.7 kg and 2600 kg | 56 % more or 3296.7 kg |
Motor
| Displacement | 11 l. and 4.4 l. | 60 % more or 6.6 l. |
| Full power | 246.1 kW and 73.5 kW | 70 % more or 172.6 kW |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 190 l/min and 82.2 l/min | 57 % more or 107.8 l/min |
| Remote control valves number | 4 and 2 | 50 % more or 2 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4160 mm and 6750 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2504 mm and 3627 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2340 mm and 3597 mm |
| Tyre size | Front 380/70 R24 Rear 480/70 R34 and 520/85R42 |
Operation
| Working weight | 3450 kg and 13834.6 kg |
| Three-point attachment type | Cat. 2 and Category III/IVN |
Motor
| Aspiration | turbocharging and Turbocharged engine with subsequent cooling of charging air by oncoming air flow |
| Manufacturer | Perkins and Cummins |
| Model | 1104C-44T and QSM11 |
Hydraulic system
| Overflow valve pressure | 18000 kPa and 19700 kPa |
Gear box
| Transmission type | mechanical reversing clutch and Mechanical gearbox Quadshift 12x4 |
Axle
| Last transmission | planetary gear and multipurpose, planetary, located inside |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4160 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 6750 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2504 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3627 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2340 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3597 mm |