- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick C95 Max vs. Massey Ferguson MF 5355
McCormick C95 Max vs. Massey Ferguson MF 5355
6 reasons to buy McCormick C95 Max:
Motor
Displacement | 4.4 l. and 4.1 l. | 7 % more or 0.3 l. |
Hydraulic system
Remote control valves number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
Pump bandwidth | 82.2 l/min and 28 l/min | 66 % more or 54.2 l/min |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 24 and 12 | 50 % more or 12 |
Reverse gears number | 12 and 4 | 67 % more or 8 |
Maximum speed | 40 km/h and 30 km/h | 25 % more or 10 km/h |
2 reasons to buy Massey Ferguson MF 5355:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 125 l. and 102 l. | 18 % more or 23 l. |
Motor
Full power | 68.6 kW and 68.5 kW | 0 % more or 0.1 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Dimensional length | 4136 mm and 4010 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2558 mm and 2660 mm |
Wheelbase | 2316 mm and 2350 mm |
Tyre size | Front 13.6-24 Rear 16.9-34 and Front 14.9-24 Rear 18.4-34 |
Operation
Working weight | 3330 kg and 3912 kg |
Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 2600 kg and 2600 kg |
Motor
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Manufacturer | Perkins and Perkins |
Model | 1104C-44T and P4001T |
Hydraulic system
Overflow valve pressure | 18000 kPa and 21000 kPa |
Gear box
Transmission type | mechanical reversing clutch and synchronizer |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 4136 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4010 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2558 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2660 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 2316 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2350 mm |