- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick CN50 vs. Massey Ferguson MF 660
McCormick CN50 vs. Massey Ferguson MF 660
4 reasons to buy McCormick CN50:
Motor
Power measured at | 2600 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 15 % more or 400 rev |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 34.4 l/min and 27 l/min | 22 % more or 7.4 l/min |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 16 and 12 | 25 % more or 4 |
Reverse gears number | 16 and 5 | 69 % more or 11 |
4 reasons to buy Massey Ferguson MF 660:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 445 l. and 51 l. | 89 % more or 394 l. |
Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 4500 kg and 1478 kg | 67 % more or 3022 kg |
Motor
Displacement | 6 l. and 2.5 l. | 58 % more or 3.5 l. |
Full power | 111.9 kW and 35 kW | 69 % more or 76.9 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Dimensional length | 3193 mm and 4860 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2408 mm and 2980 mm |
Wheelbase | 1900 mm and 2920 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 2360 kg and 6375 kg |
Motor
Power take mechanism power | 32.8 kW and 99.6 kW |
Manufacturer | Mitsubishi and Perkins |
Gear box
Transmission type | transmission with synchronizer and synchronizer |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 3193 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4860 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2408 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2980 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 1900 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2920 mm |