- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick CN50 vs. Tong Yang Moolsan T353
McCormick CN50 vs. Tong Yang Moolsan T353
8 reasons to buy McCormick CN50:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 51 l. and 34 l. | 33 % more or 17 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 1478 kg and 800 kg | 46 % more or 678 kg |
Motor
| Full power | 35 kW and 26.1 kW | 25 % more or 8.9 kW |
| Displacement | 2.5 l. and 1.8 l. | 28 % more or 0.7 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Remote control valves number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
Gear box
| Reverse gears number | 16 and 12 | 25 % more or 4 |
| Maximum speed | 27.7 km/h and 21.6 km/h | 22 % more or 6.1 km/h |
| Forward gears number | 16 and 12 | 25 % more or 4 |
4 reasons to buy Tong Yang Moolsan T353:
Operation
| Turn radius | 2400 mm and 2799 mm | 14 % less or 399 mm |
| Generator current strength | 50 amperes and 45 amperes | 10 % more or 5 amperes |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2700 rev / min and 2600 rev / min | 4 % more or 100 rev |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 40.1 l/min and 34.4 l/min | 14 % more or 5.7 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Outer frame width | 1303 mm and 1360 mm |
| Dimensional length | 3193 mm and 3200 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2408 mm and 2400 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1900 mm and 1640 mm |
Operation
| Three-point attachment type | 1 and Cat. I |
| Working weight | 2360 kg and 1390 kg |
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi and Mitsubishi |
| Power take mechanism power | 32.8 kW and 21.6 kW |
| Cylinders number | 4 and 4 |
Gear box
| Transmission type | transmission with synchronizer and transmission with synchronizer |
Images
Sizes
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2408 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2400 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 1900 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1640 mm |
| 1. Dimensional length | 3193 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3200 mm |
| 2. Outer frame width | 1303 mm | 2. Outer frame width | 1360 mm |