- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick CT36 vs. Tong Yang Moolsan T353
McCormick CT36 vs. Tong Yang Moolsan T353
4 reasons to buy McCormick CT36:
Operation
Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 1188 kg and 800 kg | 33 % more or 388 kg |
Motor
Full power | 28.7 kW and 26.1 kW | 9 % more or 2.6 kW |
Hydraulic system
Remote control valves number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
Gear box
Maximum speed | 27.4 km/h and 21.6 km/h | 21 % more or 5.8 km/h |
3 reasons to buy Tong Yang Moolsan T353:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 34 l. and 32 l. | 6 % more or 2 l. |
Turn radius | 2400 mm and 2558 mm | 6 % less or 158 mm |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 40.1 l/min and 30.8 l/min | 23 % more or 9.3 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Dimensional length | 2987 mm and 3200 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2314 mm and 2400 mm |
Wheelbase | 1660 mm and 1640 mm |
Operation
Three-point attachment type | 1 and Cat. I |
Working weight | 1230 kg and 1390 kg |
Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Generator current strength | 50 amperes and 50 amperes |
Motor
Power take mechanism power | 23.1 kW and 21.6 kW |
Power measured at | 2700 rev / min and 2700 rev / min |
Displacement | 1.8 l. and 1.8 l. |
Cylinders number | 4 and 4 |
Gear box
Reverse gears number | 12 and 12 |
Transmission type | Synchronized and transmission with synchronizer |
Forward gears number | 12 and 12 |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 2987 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3200 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2314 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2400 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 1660 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1640 mm |