- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick CX105 vs. Fendt 818
McCormick CX105 vs. Fendt 818
2 reasons to buy McCormick CX105:
Operation
Turn radius | 4480 mm and 5600 mm | 20 % less or 1120 mm |
Motor
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
8 reasons to buy Fendt 818:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 340 l. and 155 l. | 54 % more or 185 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 45 l. and 37 l. | 18 % more or 8 l. |
Motor
Displacement | 5.7 l. and 4.4 l. | 23 % more or 1.3 l. |
Torque increase | 37 % and 29 % | 22 % more or 8 % |
Cylinders number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
Full power | 143 kW and 76.1 kW | 47 % more or 66.9 kW |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 110 l/min and 60 l/min | 45 % more or 50 l/min |
Gear box
Maximum speed | 50 km/h and 40 km/h | 20 % more or 10 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Dimensional length | 4209 mm and 4700 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2540 mm and 3020 mm |
Wheelbase | 2356 mm and 2720 mm |
Tyre size | Front 12.4R24 Rear 16.9R34 and Front 540/65R30, Rear 650/65R42 |
Outer frame width | 2147 mm and 2550 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 3770 kg and 6800 kg |
Motor
Aspiration | Turbocharger with wastegate and Turbocharging with intercooler |
Gear box
Transmission type | Powershift / power drive and Infinitely variable transmission |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 4209 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4700 mm |
2. Outer frame width | 2147 mm | 2. Outer frame width | 2550 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2540 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3020 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 2356 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2720 mm |


