- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick CX105 vs. Massey Ferguson MF 5475
McCormick CX105 vs. Massey Ferguson MF 5475
4 reasons to buy McCormick CX105:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 155 l. and 145 l. | 6 % more or 10 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 60 l/min and 56.8 l/min | 5 % more or 3.2 l/min |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 24 and 16 | 33 % more or 8 |
| Reverse gears number | 24 and 16 | 33 % more or 8 |
2 reasons to buy Massey Ferguson MF 5475:
Operation
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 4168 kg and 3875 kg | 7 % more or 293 kg |
Motor
| Displacement | 6.6 l. and 4.4 l. | 33 % more or 2.2 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4209 mm and 4818 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2540 mm and 2800 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2356 mm and 2779 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 3770 kg and 5400 kg |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
| Aspiration | Turbocharger with wastegate and turbocharging / air cooling |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Powershift / power drive and Dyna-4, 4 ranges, multifunctional servodrive |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4209 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4818 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2540 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2800 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2356 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2779 mm |