- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick CX105 vs. New Holland TN60DA
McCormick CX105 vs. New Holland TN60DA
7 reasons to buy McCormick CX105:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 155 l. and 74 l. | 52 % more or 81 l. |
Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 3875 kg and 1800 kg | 54 % more or 2075 kg |
Motor
Cylinders number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
Torque increase | 29 % and 26 % | 10 % more or 3 % |
Displacement | 4.4 l. and 2.9 l. | 34 % more or 1.5 l. |
Full power | 76.1 kW and 42.5 kW | 44 % more or 33.6 kW |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 60 l/min and 48 l/min | 20 % more or 12 l/min |
2 reasons to buy New Holland TN60DA:
Operation
Turn radius | 3810 mm and 4480 mm | 15 % less or 670 mm |
Motor
Power measured at | 2300 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 4 % more or 100 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Tyre size | Front 12.4R24 Rear 16.9R34 and Front: 11.2x20, Rear 14.9x28 |
Dimensional length | 4209 mm and 3912 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2540 mm and 2307 mm |
Wheelbase | 2356 mm and 2065 mm |
Motor
Aspiration | Turbocharger with wastegate and natural aspiration |
Gear box
Transmission type | Powershift / power drive and 8x8 full mesh transmission with synchronized mechanical drive |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 4209 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3912 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2540 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2307 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 2356 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2065 mm |


