- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick CX105 vs. Yanmar EF453T
McCormick CX105 vs. Yanmar EF453T
7 reasons to buy McCormick CX105:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 155 l. and 40 l. | 74 % more or 115 l. |
Motor
Displacement | 4.4 l. and 2.2 l. | 50 % more or 2.2 l. |
Full power | 76.1 kW and 33.1 kW | 57 % more or 43.0 kW |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 60 l/min and 32 l/min | 47 % more or 28 l/min |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 24 and 9 | 62 % more or 15 |
Reverse gears number | 24 and 9 | 62 % more or 15 |
Maximum speed | 40 km/h and 28.6 km/h | 28 % more or 11.4 km/h |
1 reasons to buy Yanmar EF453T:
Motor
Power measured at | 2700 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 19 % more or 500 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Dimensional length | 4209 mm and 3230 mm |
Wheelbase | 2356 mm and 1830 mm |
Tyre size | Front 12.4R24 Rear 16.9R34 and Front 8 -18, Rear 13.6-26 |
Outer frame width | 2147 mm and 1605 mm |
Motor
Cylinders number | 4 and 4 |
Gear box
Transmission type | Powershift / power drive and full mesh |
Images
Sizes
4. Wheelbase | 2356 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1830 mm |
1. Dimensional length | 4209 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3230 mm |
2. Outer frame width | 2147 mm | 2. Outer frame width | 1605 mm |


