- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick CX75 vs. Fendt 208 PA
McCormick CX75 vs. Fendt 208 PA
4 reasons to buy McCormick CX75:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 155 l. and 70 l. | 55 % more or 85 l. |
Motor
| Displacement | 4.4 l. and 4.3 l. | 2 % more or 0.1 l. |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 24 and 21 | 12 % more or 3 |
| Reverse gears number | 24 and 6 | 75 % more or 18 |
4 reasons to buy Fendt 208 PA:
Motor
| Torque increase | 29 % and 25 % | 14 % more or 4 % |
| Full power | 59 kW and 54.4 kW | 8 % more or 4.6 kW |
| Power measured at | 2300 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 4 % more or 100 rev |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 74 l/min and 60 l/min | 19 % more or 14 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Outer frame width | 2147 mm and 1666 mm |
| Dimensional length | 4209 mm and 3665 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2540 mm and 2420 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2356 mm and 2221 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 3770 kg and 2750 kg |
Motor
| Cylinders number | 4 and 4 |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Powershift / power drive and Gearbox with overdrive, with synchronizer, with close in magnitude gear ratios |
| Maximum speed | 40 km/h and 40 km/h |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4209 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3665 mm |
| 2. Outer frame width | 2147 mm | 2. Outer frame width | 1666 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2540 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2420 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2356 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2221 mm |