- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick CX95 vs. Landini Vision 95
McCormick CX95 vs. Landini Vision 95
3 reasons to buy McCormick CX95:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 155 l. and 121.1 l. | 22 % more or 33.9 l. |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 24 and 20 | 17 % more or 4 |
Reverse gears number | 24 and 20 | 17 % more or 4 |
2 reasons to buy Landini Vision 95:
Motor
Full power | 68.5 kW and 67.1 kW | 2 % more or 1.4 kW |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 85.2 l/min and 60 l/min | 30 % more or 25.2 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Wheelbase | 2356 mm and 2380 mm |
Tyre size | Front 12.4R24 Rear 16.9R34 and 540/65R34 |
Outer frame width | 2147 mm and 1850 mm |
Dimensional length | 4209 mm and 4430 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2540 mm and 2630 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 3770 kg and 4061.5 kg |
Motor
Displacement | 4.4 l. and 4.4 l. |
Aspiration | Turbocharger with wastegate and turbocharging |
Cylinders number | 4 and 4 |
Gear box
Transmission type | Powershift / power drive and 5-speed transmission with lower gear and reverse mechanical drive |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 4209 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4430 mm |
2. Outer frame width | 2147 mm | 2. Outer frame width | 1850 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2540 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2630 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 2356 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2380 mm |


