- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick CX95 vs. McCormick MC95
McCormick CX95 vs. McCormick MC95
3 reasons to buy McCormick CX95:
Motor
Full power | 67.1 kW and 66.5 kW | 1 % more or 0.6 kW |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 24 and 16 | 33 % more or 8 |
Reverse gears number | 24 and 12 | 50 % more or 12 |
4 reasons to buy McCormick MC95:
Operation
Turn radius | 4340 mm and 4480 mm | 3 % less or 140 mm |
Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 5871 kg and 3875 kg | 34 % more or 1996 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 196 l. and 155 l. | 21 % more or 41 l. |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 109 l/min and 60 l/min | 45 % more or 49 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Dimensional length | 4209 mm and 4333 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2540 mm and 2790 mm |
Wheelbase | 2356 mm and 2422 mm |
Tyre size | Front 12.4R24 Rear 16.9R34 and Front 13.6R28 Rear 16.9R38 |
Outer frame width | 2147 mm and 2148 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 3770 kg and 5400 kg |
Motor
Cylinders number | 4 and 4 |
Aspiration | Turbocharger with wastegate and Intermediate cooler exhaust turbocharger with wastegate |
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
Torque increase | 33 % and 33 % |
Displacement | 4.4 l. and 4.4 l. |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 4209 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4333 mm |
2. Outer frame width | 2147 mm | 2. Outer frame width | 2148 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2540 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2790 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 2356 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2422 mm |


