- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick MC115 vs. Massey Ferguson 2625
McCormick MC115 vs. Massey Ferguson 2625
8 reasons to buy McCormick MC115:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 196 l. and 42 l. | 79 % more or 154 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 5871 kg and 2050 kg | 65 % more or 3821 kg |
| Generator current strength | 95 amperes and 36 amperes | 62 % more or 59 amperes |
Motor
| Full power | 88 kW and 47 kW | 47 % more or 41 kW |
| Displacement | 4.4 l. and 3.6 l. | 18 % more or 0.8 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 109 l/min and 86.3 l/min | 21 % more or 22.7 l/min |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 16 and 8 | 50 % more or 8 |
| Reverse gears number | 12 and 2 | 83 % more or 10 |
1 reasons to buy Massey Ferguson 2625:
Motor
| Power measured at | 2300 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 4 % more or 100 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4423 mm and 3526 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2790 mm and 2395 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2517 mm and 2066 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 5495 kg and 2580.9 kg |
| Three-point attachment type | Cat. IIIN and Cat. I and II |
Motor
| Aspiration | Intermediate cooler exhaust turbocharger with wastegate and natural aspiration |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4423 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3526 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2790 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2395 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2517 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2066 mm |