- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick MC95 vs. Goldoni Aster 40
McCormick MC95 vs. Goldoni Aster 40
6 reasons to buy McCormick MC95:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 196 l. and 40 l. | 80 % more or 156 l. |
Motor
| Torque increase | 33 % and 20 % | 39 % more or 13 % |
| Cylinders number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
| Displacement | 4.4 l. and 1.6 l. | 64 % more or 2.8 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 109 l/min and 33 l/min | 70 % more or 76 l/min |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 16 and 12 | 25 % more or 4 |
2 reasons to buy Goldoni Aster 40:
Operation
| Turn radius | 2800 mm and 4340 mm | 35 % less or 1540 mm |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2800 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 21 % more or 600 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Outer frame width | 2148 mm and 1507 mm |
| Dimensional length | 4333 mm and 3067 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2790 mm and 2192 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2422 mm and 1616 mm |
| Tyre size | Front 13.6R28 Rear 16.9R38 and Front 200/70x16, Rear 320/70x24 |
Operation
| Three-point attachment type | Cat. IIIN and Grade I |
| Working weight | 5400 kg and 1655 kg |
Gear box
| Reverse gears number | 12 and 12 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4333 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3067 mm |
| 2. Outer frame width | 2148 mm | 2. Outer frame width | 1507 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2790 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2192 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2422 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1616 mm |