- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Ursus 1934 vs. McCormick CT32
Ursus 1934 vs. McCormick CT32
9 reasons to buy Ursus 1934:
Operation
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 7200 kg and 1188 kg | 83 % more or 6012 kg |
| Generator current strength | 70 amperes and 50 amperes | 29 % more or 20 amperes |
| Fuel Capacity | 355 l. and 32 l. | 91 % more or 323 l. |
Motor
| Displacement | 7.3 l. and 1.6 l. | 78 % more or 5.7 l. |
| Cylinders number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
| Full power | 141.7 kW and 23.9 kW | 83 % more or 117.8 kW |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 55 l/min and 30 l/min | 45 % more or 25 l/min |
Gear box
| Maximum speed | 29.3 km/h and 26.5 km/h | 10 % more or 2.8 km/h |
| Forward gears number | 16 and 12 | 25 % more or 4 |
2 reasons to buy McCormick CT32:
Motor
| Power measured at | 2600 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 15 % more or 400 rev |
Gear box
| Reverse gears number | 12 and 8 | 33 % more or 4 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4500 mm and 2987 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2706 mm and 1660 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 14 V and 12 V |
| Working weight | 6180 kg and 1200 kg |
| Three-point attachment type | Cat. III and 1 |
Motor
| Power take mechanism power | 120.1 kW and 19.4 kW |
Gear box
| Transmission type | mechanical with synchronizer and Synchronized |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4500 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 2987 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2706 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1660 mm |