- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Yanmar EG782M vs. McCormick CT41
Yanmar EG782M vs. McCormick CT41
7 reasons to buy Yanmar EG782M:
Sizes
Clearance | 445 mm and 355 mm | 20 % more or 90 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 95 l. and 38 l. | 60 % more or 57 l. |
Motor
Displacement | 3.3 l. and 2.3 l. | 30 % more or 1.0 l. |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 51.2 l/min and 31 l/min | 39 % more or 20.2 l/min |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 40 and 16 | 60 % more or 24 |
Reverse gears number | 40 and 16 | 60 % more or 24 |
Maximum speed | 34.1 km/h and 28.7 km/h | 16 % more or 5.4 km/h |
1 reasons to buy McCormick CT41:
Operation
Turn radius | 2540 mm and 3300 mm | 23 % less or 760 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Dimensional length | 3870 mm and 3192 mm |
Wheelbase | 2200 mm and 1758 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2620 mm and 2415 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 2825 kg and 1625 kg |
Three-point attachment type | grapple and 1 |
Motor
Cylinders number | 4 and 4 |
Gear box
Transmission type | synchronizer and Synchronized |
Images
Sizes
5. Clearance | 445 mm | 5. Clearance | 355 mm |
1. Dimensional length | 3870 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3192 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2620 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2415 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 2200 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1758 mm |


