- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Yanmar Ke - 200H vs. McCormick CX75-L
Yanmar Ke - 200H vs. McCormick CX75-L
4 reasons to buy McCormick CX75-L:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 90 l. and 22 l. | 76 % more or 68 l. |
Motor
| Displacement | 3.3 l. and 1 l. | 70 % more or 2.3 l. |
| Cylinders number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
| Full power | 56.7 kW and 14.9 kW | 74 % more or 41.8 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 2715 mm and 4020 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2192 mm and 2485 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1473 mm and 2162 mm |
| Tyre size | Front 23x8.50 - 12, Rear 315/75D15 and 12.4R36 |
| Outer frame width | 1196 mm and 1876 mm |
Operation
| Three-point attachment type | SAE 1 and Cat. 2 |
| Working weight | 748 kg and 3050 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Yanmar and Perkins |
| Model | 3TNE74 and 804C-33T |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Hydrostatic 2 speed transmission and mechanical reversing clutch |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 2715 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4020 mm |
| 2. Outer frame width | 1196 mm | 2. Outer frame width | 1876 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2192 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2485 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 1473 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2162 mm |