- Home/
- Comparison/
- Articulated Hauler/
- Case 335 vs. Caterpillar 745C
Case 335 vs. Caterpillar 745C
3 reasons to buy Case 335:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 300.2 l. and 139.7 l. | 53 % more or 160.5 l. |
Gear box
| Reverse gears number | 3 and 2 | 33 % more or 1 |
Dump
| Lifting time | 11 sec and 12 sec | 8 % less or 1 sec |
10 reasons to buy Caterpillar 745C:
Operation
| Transmission fluid volume | 75 l. and 35.6 l. | 53 % more or 39.4 l. |
| Fuel Capacity | 550 l. and 450.5 l. | 18 % more or 99.5 l. |
Motor
| Displacement | 18.1 l. and 12.9 l. | 29 % more or 5.2 l. |
| Full power | 381.1 kW and 305.7 kW | 20 % more or 75.4 kW |
| Torque measured at | 1200 rev / min and 1000 rev / min | 17 % more or 200 rev |
| Effective power | 369.9 kW and 283.4 kW | 23 % more or 86.5 kW |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 9 and 6 | 33 % more or 3 |
Dump
| Lowering time | 8 sec and 13 sec | 38 % less or 5 sec |
| Brimmed volume | 18.5 m3 and 15 m3 | 19 % more or 3.5 m3 |
| Volume with top | 25 m3 and 20 m3 | 20 % more or 5 m3 |
Neutral reasons:
Weight
| Full empty | 28500.1 kg and 33399.8 kg |
| Maximum loading | 59999.8 kg and 40999.8 kg |
| Front axle unloaded | 14099.9 kg and 19769.8 kg |
| Unloaded rear axle | 14400 kg and 6690 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Case and Caterpillar |
| Model | 13F3B and C18 Acert |
Dump
| Nominal payload | 31499.7 kg and 41004.8 kg |
Images