- Home/
- Comparison/
- Roller-Compactor/
- Bomag BC1172RB2 vs. Caterpillar 836K
Bomag BC1172RB2 vs. Caterpillar 836K
4 reasons to buy Bomag BC1172RB2:
Sizes
Clearance | 765 mm and 630.9 mm | 18 % more or 134.1 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 1000 l. and 791.2 l. | 21 % more or 208.8 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 590 l. and 238.5 l. | 60 % more or 351.5 l. |
Motor
Full power | 445.9 kW and 419.1 kW | 6 % more or 26.8 kW |
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar 836K:
Gear box
Forward gears number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
Reverse gears number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Length with blade on ground level | 9425 mm and 10183.4 mm |
Width between wheels | 4500 mm and 4279.4 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 4845 mm and 4654.3 mm |
Wheelbase | 4100 mm and 4550.7 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 54431.1 kg and 55936.6 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Deutz and Caterpillar |
Model | TCD 2015V08 and C18 Acert |
Gear box
Transmission type | hydrostatic and planetary powershift transmission - ECPC |
Images
Sizes
1. Length with blade on ground level | 9425 mm | 1. Length with blade on ground level | 10183.4 mm |
2. Width between wheels | 4500 mm | 2. Width between wheels | 4279.4 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 4845 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 4654.3 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 4100 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 4550.7 mm |
5. Clearance | 765 mm | 5. Clearance | 630.9 mm |