- Home/
- Comparison/
- Roller-Compactor/
- Bomag BC672RB2 vs. Caterpillar 826K
Bomag BC672RB2 vs. Caterpillar 826K
2 reasons to buy Bomag BC672RB2:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 350 l. and 117 l. | 67 % more or 233 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 334.8 kW and 324.4 kW | 3 % more or 10.4 kW |
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar 826K:
Sizes
| Clearance | 643.1 mm and 580 mm | 10 % more or 63.1 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 782.1 l. and 500 l. | 36 % more or 282.1 l. |
Gear box
| Reverse gears number | 3 and 2 | 33 % more or 1 |
| Forward gears number | 3 and 2 | 33 % more or 1 |
Neutral reasons:
Wheels
| Front wheels roller width | 1350 mm and 100.1 mm |
| Front wheels roller diameter | 1620 mm and 134.1 mm |
Sizes
| Length with blade on ground level | 8120 mm and 8714.2 mm |
| Width between wheels | 3775 mm and 3800.9 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 4100 mm and 4569 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3500 mm and 3700.3 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 32205.1 kg and 40917.2 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Deutz and Caterpillar |
| Model | TCD 2015V06 and C15 Acert |
Gear box
| Transmission type | hydrostatic and planetary powershift transmission - ECPC |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length with blade on ground level | 8120 mm | 1. Length with blade on ground level | 8714.2 mm |
| 2. Width between wheels | 3775 mm | 2. Width between wheels | 3800.9 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 4100 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 4569 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3500 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3700.3 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 580 mm | 5. Clearance | 643.1 mm |