- Home/
- Comparison/
- Roller-Compactor/
- Dynapac CT260 vs. Caterpillar 816F
Dynapac CT260 vs. Caterpillar 816F
3 reasons to buy Dynapac CT260:
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 4 and 2 | 50 % more or 2 |
| Reverse gears number | 4 and 2 | 50 % more or 2 |
| Maximum speed | 22.4 km/h and 10.6 km/h | 53 % more or 11.8 km/h |
3 reasons to buy Caterpillar 816F:
Sizes
| Clearance | 456 mm and 430 mm | 6 % more or 26 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 445.9 l. and 400 l. | 10 % more or 45.9 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 179 kW and 156.6 kW | 13 % more or 22.4 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Wheels
| Rear wheels roller diameter | 1.5 mm and 1300 mm |
| Front wheels roller width | 1 mm and 1016 mm |
| Front wheels roller diameter | 1.5 mm and 1300 mm |
| Rear wheels roller width | 1 mm and 1016 mm |
Sizes
| Length with blade on ground level | 3.6 mm and 7854 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3518 mm and 3801 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3250 mm and 3350 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 21400 kg and 23751.9 kg |
Motor
| Model | 6CT8.3 and 3176C ATAAC |
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
Blades
| Width | 853 mm and 3657 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 4. Wheelbase | 3250 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3350 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 430 mm | 5. Clearance | 456 mm |
| 1. Length with blade on ground level | 3.6 mm | 1. Length with blade on ground level | 7854 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3518 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3801 mm |