- Home/
- Comparison/
- Roller-Compactor/
- Dynapac CT260 vs. Caterpillar 936 for landfill
Dynapac CT260 vs. Caterpillar 936 for landfill
1 reasons to buy Dynapac CT260:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 400 l. and 167 l. | 58 % more or 233 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Wheels
Front wheels roller width | 1 mm and 533 mm |
Front wheels roller diameter | 1.5 mm and 1220 mm |
Rear wheels roller width | 1 mm and 533 mm |
Rear wheels roller diameter | 1.5 mm and 1220 mm |
Sizes
Width between wheels | 853 mm and 2660 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3518 mm and 3440 mm |
Wheelbase | 3250 mm and 3020 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 21400 kg and 15188 kg |
Motor
Model | 6CT8.3 and 3304 |
Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 4 and 4 |
Reverse gears number | 4 and 4 |
Images
Sizes
2. Width between wheels | 853 mm | 2. Width between wheels | 2660 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3518 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3440 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 3250 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3020 mm |