- Home/
- Comparison/
- Roller-Compactor/
- Dynapac CT260 vs. Ingersoll Rand SD122F
Dynapac CT260 vs. Ingersoll Rand SD122F
4 reasons to buy Dynapac CT260:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 400 l. and 257 l. | 36 % more or 143 l. |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 4 and 2 | 50 % more or 2 |
| Reverse gears number | 4 and 2 | 50 % more or 2 |
| Maximum speed | 22.4 km/h and 12.7 km/h | 43 % more or 9.7 km/h |
1 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD122F:
Sizes
| Clearance | 483 mm and 430 mm | 11 % more or 53 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Wheels
| Front wheels roller width | 1 mm and 2134 mm |
| Front wheels roller diameter | 1.5 mm and 1499 mm |
Sizes
| Length with blade on ground level | 3.6 mm and 5895 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3250 mm and 3100 mm |
| Width between wheels | 853 mm and 2286 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3518 mm and 3146 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 21400 kg and 12805 kg |
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | 6CT8.3 and QSB5.9-30T |
Gear box
| Transmission type | twin disc and hydrostatic |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length with blade on ground level | 3.6 mm | 1. Length with blade on ground level | 5895 mm |
| 2. Width between wheels | 853 mm | 2. Width between wheels | 2286 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3518 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3250 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3100 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 430 mm | 5. Clearance | 483 mm |