- Home/
- Comparison/
- Roller-Compactor/
- Komatsu WF550T-3 vs. Caterpillar 836K
Komatsu WF550T-3 vs. Caterpillar 836K
8 reasons to buy Caterpillar 836K:
Sizes
| Clearance | 630.9 mm and 500 mm | 21 % more or 130.9 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 791.2 l. and 340 l. | 57 % more or 451.2 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 238.5 l. and 160 l. | 33 % more or 78.5 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 106 l. and 68 l. | 36 % more or 38 l. |
| Transmission fluid volume | 121.1 l. and 60 l. | 50 % more or 61.1 l. |
Motor
| Displacement | 18.1 l. and 15.2 l. | 16 % more or 2.9 l. |
| Maximum torque | 3084.5 Nm and 1375 Nm | 55 % more or 1709.5 Nm |
| Full power | 419.1 kW and 235 kW | 44 % more or 184.1 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 4210 mm and 4654.3 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3600 mm and 4550.7 mm |
| Length with blade on ground level | 8145 mm and 10183.4 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 35100 kg and 55936.6 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Komatsu and Caterpillar |
| Model | SA6D140E and C18 Acert |
Gear box
| Transmission type | powershift and planetary powershift transmission - ECPC |
| Forward gears number | 4 and 4 |
| Reverse gears number | 4 and 4 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length with blade on ground level | 8145 mm | 1. Length with blade on ground level | 10183.4 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 4210 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 4654.3 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3600 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 4550.7 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 500 mm | 5. Clearance | 630.9 mm |