- Home/
- Comparison/
- Roller-Compactor/
- Volvo 4600 vs. Caterpillar 825K
Volvo 4600 vs. Caterpillar 825K
1 reasons to buy Volvo 4600:
Sizes
| Clearance | 520 mm and 487.7 mm | 6 % more or 32.3 mm |
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar 825K:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 782.1 l. and 360 l. | 54 % more or 422.1 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 324.4 kW and 196.9 kW | 39 % more or 127.5 kW |
| Effective power | 302 kW and 187.9 kW | 38 % more or 114.1 kW |
| Displacement | 15.2 l. and 9.6 l. | 37 % more or 5.6 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Length with blade on ground level | 8270 mm and 8564.9 mm |
| Width between wheels | 3060 mm and 3651.5 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3550 mm and 3688.1 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 26540 kg and 35528.1 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Volvo and Caterpillar |
| Model | TD 100 G and C15 Acert |
Gear box
| Transmission type | powershift transmission and planetary – powershift transmission – ECPC |
| Forward gears number | 3 and 3 |
| Reverse gears number | 3 and 3 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length with blade on ground level | 8270 mm | 1. Length with blade on ground level | 8564.9 mm |
| 2. Width between wheels | 3060 mm | 2. Width between wheels | 3651.5 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3550 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3688.1 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 520 mm | 5. Clearance | 487.7 mm |