- Home/
- Comparison/
- Crawler-Mounted Loader/
- Komatsu D31S-17 vs. Caterpillar 973C WH
Komatsu D31S-17 vs. Caterpillar 973C WH
1 reasons to buy Komatsu D31S-17:
Carrier
Specific ground pressure | 53 kPa and 92 kPa | 42 % less or 39 kPa |
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar 973C WH:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 427.8 l. and 115 l. | 73 % more or 312.8 l. |
Cooling system fluid volume | 41.6 l. and 22 l. | 47 % more or 19.6 l. |
Maximum speed | 9 km/h and 6.5 km/h | 28 % more or 2.5 km/h |
Motor
Effective power | 178.2 kW and 49.2 kW | 72 % more or 129.0 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
Working weight | 6700 kg and 27480.9 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Komatsu and Caterpillar |
Model | 4D105-5 and C9 |
Carrier
Track shoe width | 330 mm and 500 mm |
Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1880 mm and 2930 mm |
Track width | 1450 mm and 2082.8 mm |
Images
Carrier
9. Track width | 1450 mm | 9. Track width | 2082.8 mm |