- Home/
- Comparison/
- Crawler-Mounted Loader/
- Komatsu D41S-3 vs. Caterpillar 973C WH
Komatsu D41S-3 vs. Caterpillar 973C WH
1 reasons to buy Komatsu D41S-3:
Carrier
Specific ground pressure | 65.7 kPa and 92 kPa | 29 % less or 26.3 kPa |
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar 973C WH:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 427.8 l. and 245 l. | 43 % more or 182.8 l. |
Cooling system fluid volume | 41.6 l. and 33 l. | 21 % more or 8.6 l. |
Bucket capacity with top | 4.7 m3 and 1.2 m3 | 74 % more or 3.5 m3 |
Maximum speed | 9 km/h and 7.6 km/h | 16 % more or 1.4 km/h |
Motor
Effective power | 178.2 kW and 67.1 kW | 62 % more or 111.1 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
Working weight | 11040 kg and 27480.9 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Komatsu and Caterpillar |
Model | 6D105 and C9 |
Carrier
Track shoe width | 400 mm and 500 mm |
Caterpillar track length on ground level | 2060 mm and 2930 mm |
Track width | 1540 mm and 2082.8 mm |
Images
Carrier
9. Track width | 1540 mm | 9. Track width | 2082.8 mm |