- Home/
- Comparison/
- Crawler-Mounted Loader/
- Komatsu D45S vs. Caterpillar 973C WH
Komatsu D45S vs. Caterpillar 973C WH
2 reasons to buy Komatsu D45S:
Operation
| Cooling system fluid volume | 43 l. and 41.6 l. | 3 % more or 1.4 l. |
Carrier
| Specific ground pressure | 64.7 kPa and 92 kPa | 30 % less or 27.3 kPa |
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar 973C WH:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 427.8 l. and 210 l. | 51 % more or 217.8 l. |
| Bucket capacity with top | 4.7 m3 and 1.2 m3 | 74 % more or 3.5 m3 |
| Maximum speed | 9 km/h and 8.2 km/h | 9 % more or 0.8 km/h |
Motor
| Effective power | 178.2 kW and 67.1 kW | 62 % more or 111.1 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Working weight | 10940 kg and 27480.9 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Komatsu and Caterpillar |
| Model | S4D105 and C9 |
Carrier
| Track shoe width | 400 mm and 500 mm |
| Caterpillar track length on ground level | 2060 mm and 2930 mm |
| Track width | 1540 mm and 2082.8 mm |
Images
Carrier
| 9. Track width | 1540 mm | 9. Track width | 2082.8 mm |