- Home/
- Comparison/
- Crawler-Mounted Loader/
- Komatsu D65S-7 vs. Caterpillar 973C WH
Komatsu D65S-7 vs. Caterpillar 973C WH
3 reasons to buy Komatsu D65S-7:
Operation
| Cooling system fluid volume | 55 l. and 41.6 l. | 24 % more or 13.4 l. |
| Maximum speed | 9.8 km/h and 9 km/h | 8 % more or 0.8 km/h |
Carrier
| Specific ground pressure | 72.6 kPa and 92 kPa | 21 % less or 19.4 kPa |
3 reasons to buy Caterpillar 973C WH:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 427.8 l. and 280 l. | 35 % more or 147.8 l. |
| Bucket capacity with top | 4.7 m3 and 1.8 m3 | 62 % more or 2.9 m3 |
Motor
| Effective power | 178.2 kW and 119.3 kW | 33 % more or 58.9 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Working weight | 18000 kg and 27480.9 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
| Model | NH220-CI and C9 |
Carrier
| Track shoe width | 460 mm and 500 mm |
| Caterpillar track length on ground level | 2635 mm and 2930 mm |
| Track width | 1880 mm and 2082.8 mm |
Images
Carrier
| 9. Track width | 1880 mm | 9. Track width | 2082.8 mm |