- Home/
- Comparison/
- Crawler-Mounted Loader/
- Komatsu D75S-3 vs. Caterpillar 973C WH
Komatsu D75S-3 vs. Caterpillar 973C WH
3 reasons to buy Komatsu D75S-3:
Operation
| Cooling system fluid volume | 52 l. and 41.6 l. | 20 % more or 10.4 l. |
| Maximum speed | 9.6 km/h and 9 km/h | 6 % more or 0.6 km/h |
Carrier
| Specific ground pressure | 80.4 kPa and 92 kPa | 13 % less or 11.6 kPa |
3 reasons to buy Caterpillar 973C WH:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 427.8 l. and 400 l. | 6 % more or 27.8 l. |
| Bucket capacity with top | 4.7 m3 and 2.2 m3 | 53 % more or 2.5 m3 |
Motor
| Effective power | 178.2 kW and 149.1 kW | 16 % more or 29.1 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Working weight | 20790 kg and 27480.9 kg |
Motor
| Model | NTO-6-CI and C9 |
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
Carrier
| Track shoe width | 460 mm and 500 mm |
| Caterpillar track length on ground level | 2735 mm and 2930 mm |
| Track width | 1950 mm and 2082.8 mm |
Images
Carrier
| 9. Track width | 1950 mm | 9. Track width | 2082.8 mm |