- Home/
- Comparison/
- Tracked Tractor/
- John Deere 850C vs. Komatsu D39PX-22
John Deere 850C vs. Komatsu D39PX-22
7 reasons to buy John Deere 850C:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 348.3 l. and 195 l. | 44 % more or 153.3 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 128.7 l. and 23 l. | 82 % more or 105.7 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 79.5 l. and 60 l. | 25 % more or 19.5 l. |
| Final drive fluid volume | 15.1 l. and 3.5 l. | 77 % more or 11.6 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 134.2 kW and 78.3 kW | 42 % more or 55.9 kW |
| Displacement | 7.6 l. and 4.5 l. | 41 % more or 3.1 l. |
| Cylinders number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
1 reasons to buy Komatsu D39PX-22:
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 18 % more or 400 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Width between caterpillar tracks | 3252.2 mm and 2425 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 18163.2 kg and 9890 kg |
Motor
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging, subsequent cooling of charging air by oncoming air flow |
| Manufacturer | John Deere and Komatsu |
| Model | 400 lot and SAA4D107E-1 |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Hydro-Static Transmission and dual path hydrostatic transmission |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 3252.2 mm | 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 2425 mm |