- Home/
- Comparison/
- Tracked Tractor/
- Komatsu D65E-6 vs. New Holland DC150 XLT
Komatsu D65E-6 vs. New Holland DC150 XLT
6 reasons to buy Komatsu D65E-6:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 280 l. and 270 l. | 4 % more or 10 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 55 l. and 28 l. | 49 % more or 27 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 115.6 kW and 104.4 kW | 10 % more or 11.2 kW |
| Displacement | 12.2 l. and 5.9 l. | 52 % more or 6.3 l. |
Gear box
| Maximum forward speed | 10.7 km/h and 10 km/h | 7 % more or 0.7 km/h |
| Maximum reverse gear | 13.6 km/h and 12 km/h | 12 % more or 1.6 km/h |
3 reasons to buy New Holland DC150 XLT:
Standard blade
| Cut depth | 580 mm and 540 mm | 7 % more or 40 mm |
Carrier
| Specific ground pressure | 46.9 kPa and 49 kPa | 4 % less or 2.1 kPa |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 8 and 7 | 12 % more or 1 |
Neutral reasons:
Standard blade
| Width | 3970 mm and 3200 mm |
| Height | 1050 mm and 1100 mm |
Sizes
| Caterpillar track length on ground level | 2635 mm and 2550 mm |
| Width between caterpillar tracks | 2390 mm and 3200 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 13331.1 kg and 15655 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and BT |
| Model | NH220-CI and Cummins 65.9 |
Gear box
| Transmission type | planetary gear and Powershift, camshaft, full mesh |
| Forward gears number | 3 and 3 |
| Reverse gears number | 3 and 3 |
Carrier
| Standard shoe size | 510 mm and 550 mm |
| Track width | 1880 mm and 1900 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 2390 mm | 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 3200 mm |
| 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 2635 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 2550 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Track width | 1880 mm | 7. Track width | 1900 mm |
| 8. Standard shoe size | 510 mm | 8. Standard shoe size | 550 mm |