- Home/
- Comparison/
- Tracked Tractor/
- New Holland 255 vs. Mitsubishi BD2H-E-S-HB1
New Holland 255 vs. Mitsubishi BD2H-E-S-HB1
3 reasons to buy New Holland 255:
Sizes
| Clearance | 460 mm and 290 mm | 37 % more or 170 mm |
Motor
| Displacement | 8.3 l. and 3.3 l. | 60 % more or 5.0 l. |
Gear box
| Reverse gears number | 3 and 2 | 33 % more or 1 |
Neutral reasons:
Standard blade
| Width | 3800 mm and 2540 mm |
| Height | 1500 mm and 595 mm |
Sizes
| Length without blade | 4490 mm and 2455 mm |
| Length with blade | 5855 mm and 3390 mm |
| Width between caterpillar tracks | 2940 mm and 1900 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3420 mm and 2335 mm |
| Caterpillar track length on ground level | 2973 mm and 1740 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 26600 kg and 3890 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Mitsubishi |
| Model | 6C6TAA 8.3 and C S4SE1 |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Powershift, camshaft, full mesh and DD |
| Forward gears number | 3 and 3 |
Carrier
| Standard shoe size | 550 mm and 500 mm |
| Track width | 2070 mm and 1400 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3420 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2335 mm |
| 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 2973 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 1740 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 460 mm | 5. Clearance | 290 mm |
| 6. Length without blade | 4490 mm | 6. Length without blade | 2455 mm |
| 1. Length with blade | 5855 mm | 1. Length with blade | 3390 mm |
| 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 2940 mm | 2. Width between caterpillar tracks | 1900 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Track width | 2070 mm | 7. Track width | 1400 mm |
| 8. Standard shoe size | 550 mm | 8. Standard shoe size | 500 mm |